Don’t let a PSA test rush you to cancer treatment (Contributed by Charmaine Simpson)
Womens Health Issues: its name implies most articles found here highlight women’s health issues but sometimes an exception will be made to discuss men’s health issues because we are also mothers, wives, daughters, sisters, cousins and aunts.
By now, most of you have heard about the PSA standard test that’s used to screen for prostate cancer in men. There is now a growing movement against this test because of the mutilating results of the treatment for prostate cancer after diagnosis is made using the PSA test. There’s a Canadian-trained urologist in Barbados that does the physical examination on older men but makes no recommendation for surgery, if the man is over 70 years old. From what I understand, men in Barbados openly joke about choosing death over losing their ability to have an erection so culturally, it might be very different to be a urologist in that country.
A start-up organization, Cure for Prostate Cancer Now Foundation (not yet functional) is gaining legs and may get a boost from a recommendation made by the August Annals of Internal Medicine. Even Richard Ablin, the research professor at University of Arizona that discovered the protein PSA in 1970 spent some 38 year arguing that using PSA levels as a screening mechanism for prostate cancer is useless because it scares men into having surgery or radiation with devastating results.
When Is Prostate Cancer Surgery Necessary?
Last month, a documentary film showed the humiliating consequences of the treatment for prostate cancer. It showed men in diapers because of the incontinence. One man is now barely able to walk, unable to use his bladder or have sex after several surgeries to correct the damage that occurred from accidentally freezing surrounding organs in the attempt to kill cancer cells by freezing the prostate gland. There’s another man that has not had an erection in 13 years.
The movie that these subjects appeared in has not reached the big screens yet because the movie-makers and organizers of “stop the PSA test movement” have yet to get distribution and given the fact that medicine is big business, it’s hard to fight back against the establishment. Each year 234,000 men are diagnosed with prostate cancer and of these 150,000 opt to have surgery or some form of radiation treatment and a mere 12% choose to wait for follow-up and monitoring of worsening signs.
Dr. Alan Shapiro a Los Angeles urologist says that the PSA test has done more harm than good because men often rush to treatment - surgery to remove the prostate gland or radiation to kill the cancer cells. The results of these treatments are inability to have an erection or orgasm and lifelong incontinence. In spite of the PSA test, 32,000 men die each year from the disease after the cancer spreads from the prostate because the test cannot accurately sort out deadly cancers from harmless cells.
From my own personal knowledge and experience, I can say that an irregular PSA test is no reason to rush to treatment. My husband had a problem of slowed urination, no pain and it was found that his prostate was enlarged and his PSA test was above normal. He knew that I am an alternative treatment advocate so he asked for my opinion and after much research, we decided to use Saw Palmetto and add raw pumpkin seeds to his oatmeal and mixed-nut snacks.
On his follow-up visit, his PSA test had returned to normal and is still normal today, several years later. He has also maintained his sexual health. So for those of you that want to try an alternative treatment, after your PSA test and wait to see the results of a follow-up, this would be my recommendation to mutilation of your manhood.
I am sure the debate will continue but let common sense prevail. A doctor once told me in a light-hearted manner that if you want to remain healthy you should stay away from doctors and stop having tests. He said if you have enough tests, you’re bound to find something that’s not quite right. An annual physical check-up is necessary, pap-smears for sexually active women and blood profiles are good markers for certain diseases but proceed with caution on harsh or drastic treatments and look for less invasive options.